New DHS Public Charge Rule

On August 14, 2019, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a final rule governing the public charge grounds of inadmissibility, found at section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Unless litigation halts implementation of the rule, it will go into effect after 60 days, on October 15, 2019. Here is a summary, which is based in large part on information provided by the American Immigration Lawyers’ Association (AILA).

Summary of Rule

The DHS final rule dramatically changes the standard by which the Department determines whether an applicant for adjustment of status or admission is “likely at any time to become a public charge” and therefore inadmissible to the United States (note that some noncitizens, such as asylees and refugees, are exempt from public charge determinations). Under the final rule at 8 CFR 212.21(a), USCIS removes the consideration of whether an individual is primarily dependent on public benefits, redefining public charge as a noncitizen who receives a specified public benefit for more than 12 months in the aggregate within any 36-month period (such that, for instance, receipt of two benefits in one month counts as two months).

The final rule at 8 CFR 212.21(b) defines a public benefit as:

  1. Any federal, state, local, or tribal cash assistance for income maintenance, including:
    • Social Security Income (SSI), 42 U.S.C. 1381 et seq.;
    • Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), 42 U.S.C. 601 et seq.;
    • Federal, state, or local cash benefits programs for income maintenance (often called “General Assistance” in the State context, but which also exist under other names);
  2. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), 7 U.S.C. 2011 to 2036c (formerly called Food Stamps);
  3. Medicaid, with certain exceptions, such as benefits received by individuals under the age of 21 and pregnant women (or for a period of 60 days after the last day of pregnancy);
  4. Certain federal housing or rental assistance programs:
    • Section 8 Housing Assistance under the Housing Choice Voucher Program as administered by HUD under 42 U.S.C. 1437f;
    • Section 8 Project-Based Rental Assistance (including Moderate Rehabilitation) under Section 8 of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f); and
    • Public housing under section 9 of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937.

A sufficient affidavit of support will not be outcome-determinative as to whether an individual is likely at any time in the future to become a public charge. Rather, to make that assessment, USCIS adjudicators will apply a complex totality of circumstances test that weighs various factors:

  • the alien’s age;
  • health;
  • family status;
  • education and skills;
  • assets, resources, and financial status.

Heavily weighted negative factors are:

  • Unemployment: the applicant neither studies nor works despite authorization to do so, and lacks a “reasonable prospect of future employment”
  • Public Benefits: an applicant’s receipt of specified public benefits for 12 or more months in the aggregate within any 36-month period, beginning no earlier than the 36 months prior to the application for adjustment of status or adjustment. USCIS would count months separately for each benefit received, “such that, for instance, receipt of two benefits in one month counts as two months.” Critically, however, DHS will not regard as a negative factor the receipt of specified benefits prior to the rule’s effective date, with the exception of cash assistance and long-term institutionalization benefits that DHS already considers relevant to the public charge determination under current policy.
  • Inability to cover medical costs: the applicant “is likely to require extensive medical treatment” that she likely cannot afford and cannot cover with private insurance
  • A prior immigration court determination that the alien is a public charge

Heavily weighted positive factors are:

  • Household income or assets of “at least 250 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines”
  • Individual annual income of “at least 250 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines” for the alien’s household size
  • Private health insurance (not including subsidized insurance under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act)

Applicants for adjustment of status will need to complete a new Form I-944, Declaration of Self-Sufficiency, with information about each factor.

Under the final rule, DHS will also conduct a more limited public charge determination of nonimmigrants seeking a change or extension of status, by removing the future-looking requirement of the public charge determination, and only considering whether the noncitizen has received designated benefits for more than 12 months in the aggregate within a 36-month period since obtaining the nonimmigrant status they seek to change from or extend, through the adjudication of that request.

Consequences of Rule

The DHS final rule, which is vastly more restrictive than current policy, could result in significantly higher USCIS denial rates of adjustment of status applications subject to public charge determinations. Moreover, the multi-factor test will leave substantial discretion to adjudicators and could produce inconsistent and unpredictable decision-making. Additionally, the rule will prove burdensome for the public and DHS alike.

The rule will also compound the chilling effect felt throughout immigrant communities following publication of DHS’s proposed public charge rule in 2018. A recent Urban Institute Study found that about 14% of adults in immigrants families disclosed that that they or a family member opted not to participate in a non-cash public benefit program in 2018 due to concern over jeopardizing their green card eligibility. The final rule will likely deter even greater numbers of individuals from obtaining vital medical assistance and meeting other basic needs, even when receipt of the benefits in questions is not penalized under the rule.

Relationship Between DHS Rule and Other Agencies’ Public Charge Policies

In its final rule, DHS noted its expectation that the State Department will align its own public charge policy with DHS’s. Even prior to DHS’s publication of its proposed public charge rule in 2018, the State Department had changed its public charge policy significantly-changes that have resulted in a striking rise in visa denials on public charge grounds. Further changes to State Department policy made to align with DHS’s final rule could result in even higher rates of such visa denials. Separately from the DHS rule, DOJ is developing a rule that will change its policy regarding inadmissibility and deportability on public charge grounds. DHS states in its final rule that it “will work with DOJ to ensure consistent application of the public charge ground of inadmissibility.” AILA will continue to monitor, and keep members apprised of, the progress of the DOJ rule as well as further changes to State Department policy.

Litigation

On Tuesday, August 13, San Francisco and Santa Clara counties sued DHS over the rule in the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California. Additionally, the National Immigration Law Center has announced its intent to litigate the rule. AILA will monitor and notify members of litigation developments.

One Reply to “New DHS Public Charge Rule”

  1. In America we are unique as a nation. We are all either immigrants or descended from immigrants. We are the world. And the world looks to us. Yes, even now in the ugly age of Trumpism.
    Our diverse ancestors, who often came to America poor and under-educated, worked hard & sacrificed so that their descendants could find opportunity in America.
    These ancestors must now be rolling over in their graves at this expanded public charge proposal.
    If they could speak our immigrant ancestors would disown those descendants who callously seek to close the door on today’s immigrants, those who rip apart families, those who put children in cages., those who scapegoat immigrants.
    Our ancestors would curse those who seek to eradicate & wipe out the embracing & welcoming words that inspired them , and that still adorn our Statue of Liberty:
    “Give me your tired, your poor,
    Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”
    This Trump proposal is not making America great.
    Instead Trump is trying to smash that golden lamp and extinquish its light, as he attempts to rape and ravage that Lady of the Harbor and all that she stands for.
    This Trump proposal is an insult to our immigrant tradition, to our immigrant roots, and to all the immigrants who REALLY made & make this country great.
    Americans will not let this shameless billionaire con-man hijack and destroy the American Dream for his own crass & cruel political purposes.

    Ths too will pass- but If anyone needs to be deported, it’s surely Trump. Greenland? Russia & his pal Putin? Please, anywhere – just GO, before you ruin America any further!
    P.S.
    No one less that former President Obama revealed that when he was growing up HIS family needed to depend on welfare and food stamps for a time in order to tide them over in rough times –and to allow Mr. Obama to eventually give back to this country many times over with his years of public service.
    Those deplorable & disgusting politicians like Trump, who would reject immigrants on such a basis, are themselves immoral, unfit and un-American traitors – traitors to the true soul & spirit and ideals of America.
    In fact Mr Trump, it is the ultra-rich and zero-tax corporations that are the true “public charges” that you so falsely accuse immigrants of being. IF you had any sense of decency you would hang your head in shame Mr. Trump, for what you are, and what you do. I pray that Americans soundly reject you and what you stand for in 2020.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *