A spouse who immigrates based on marriage to a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident will be granted conditional resident (CR) status if, at the time of admission as an immigrant, the marriage is less than two years old.
USCIS has announced that a new “travel document” will replace reentry permits and refugee travel documents. The USCIS’ purpose is to have a document more secure against tampering, counterfeiting, and fraud. The new document went into production on Oct. 24, 2019.
A member of the U.S. Congress may be willing to inquire with a Federal immigration agency, such as U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and the U.S. Department of State (DOS), if you are having problems with your case.
If you are a U.S. lawful permanent resident (LPR), there are at least three situations where applying for a reentry permit may be beneficial: (a) if you will be abroad for one year or more; (b) if you will be abroad for more than six months for two consecutive years; and (c) if you have been warned by U.S. Customs and Border Inspection (CBP) officer that you are at risk of abandoning your permanent resident status. Continue reading “Guide to Reentry Permits”
2018 is a historic year for American companies operating in China: as China marks its 40th anniversary of economic reform and opening, AmCham China is issuing the 20th edition of its American Business in China White Paper. This paper is a comprehensive assessment of the operating environment for foreign companies in China.
It was a pleasure to participate in drafting the chapter on U.S. visa policy, which discusses the following topics:
Controlling nonimmigrant visa appointment waiting times in China
USCIS international entrepreneur rule
Subjecting EVUS registrants to questions about social media use
Inadequate annual H-1B visa cap
Barriers to permanent residents taking assignments abroad
Need for a Global Entry enrollment center in Beijing
To read the Visa Policy chapter, see here. To read the entire White Paper, see here.
I am a U.S. green card holder, but I live in Asia with my husband, who is a U.S. citizen employed here by an American company. Is there any risk that I may unintentionally lose my LPR status because I am spending too much time outside the U.S.?
This memo summarizes the rights and obligations you have upon becoming a U.S. lawful permanent resident (LPR), also known as a “green card” holder. You might want to keep a copy of this memo so that you can refer to it in the future. Questions or comments are welcome in the below comments section. Continue reading “Rights and Obligations of Lawful Permanent Residents”
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has announced it is raising fees an average of 10%, effective Nov. 23, 2010. The agency is primarily fee-based, with about 90% of its budget coming from applicants and petitioners seeking immigration benefits. The agency justifies the fee increase as a way to recover costs after fiscal year 2008 and 2009 revenue was much lower than projected, due in large part to increased migration during the global recession.
Highlights of the new fees include:
* Form I-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker: increased from $320 to $325.
* Form I-129F, Petition for Alien Fiancee: reduced from $455 to $340.
* Form I-130, Petition for Alien Relative: increased from $355 to $420.
* Form I-485, Application to Adjust Status: increased from $930 to $985.
* Form I-526, Petition for Alien Entrepreneur: increased from $1,435 to $1,500.
* Form I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions of Residence: increased from $465 to $505.
* Form N-400, Application for Naturalization: not changed, $595.
There will also be a new fee of $165 for Immigrant Visa Domestic Processing. This fee will apply to applicants for immigrant visas. It is designed to recover the costs of USCIS staff time to process, file, and maintain the visa package and the cost of producing the permanent resident card. The U.S. Department of State will collect the fee on behalf of USCIS, although the precise logistics have not yet been announced.
A growing number ofÂ Â lawful permanent residents (“LPRs” or “green card holders”) are relinquishing their status.
According to the below article from South China Morning Post, the main reason is theÂ costly and complex U.S. tax system. Â Both U.S. citizens and permanent residents are taxed based on their worldwide income, including income earned abroad. As a result, they may be subject to double-taxation by the U.S and the country where the income is earned. U.S. citizens and permanent residentsÂ also must disclose the combined value of their personal overseas bank accounts if they exceed US $10,000 at any time in a given year.
If you are a green card holder and you do not plan to live in the U.S., it may be wise to relinquish your status.
This involves filing with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (UCSIS) a Form I-407, Abandonment of Lawful Permanent Resident Status. You should also pay IRS the required “exit tax.” After relinquishing your green card, you may well qualify for a B1/B2 (visitor for business) visa. And, yes, our law firm can help with the I-407 and new visa application.
US Green card loses allure as taxman takes bigger cut
South China Morning Post Â | April 6, 2010 | Irene Jay Liu
Posted on Tuesday, April 06, 2010 10:29:26 AM by PGR88
Once a symbol of security in uncertain times, the US passport has lost its appeal for an increasing number of people in Asia and across the globe, who are giving up their citizenship in record numbers. For those in Hong Kong, the combination of relative political stability, growing regional economic opportunity, and increasingly complex and costly tax requirements are driving people to give up the safety net of US citizenship.
In the last quarter of 2009, 502 people relinquished their citizenship or long-term permanent residency status in the United States, a nearly eight-fold increase compared with the last quarter in 2008, when 63 people did so, according to the US Federal Register, which publishes the names of such people on a quarterly basis.
In recent years, the number of people worldwide giving up US citizenship or permanent residency has ranged from 22 to 144 people per quarter.
The numbers dipped to double digits in 2008, when the government created an “exit tax” on assets that made it expensive for the wealthy to give up their passports or green cards. But the devaluation of assets, along with the economic crisis, has seen the expatriation rate shoot up over the past six months.
An analysis by the South China Morning Post (SEHK: 0583, announcements, news) found that about 150 people with Chinese, South Korean or Japanese names gave up US citizenship in the last three months of 2009, including 87 with Chinese surnames. For the same period in 2008, only nine people with Chinese surnames did so.
The rising numbers were a result of the costly and increasingly complex taxation system in the US, said Joseph Field, senior regional partner for Asia at the law firm Withers Worldwide, which works with clients from Hong Kong and Taiwan to navigate the complex American tax requirements for citizens living abroad.
Field also noted that the global crackdown on offshore tax evasion has inadvertently had an impact on Americans living abroad in “dramatic and perhaps unfair” ways, especially for those who do not even know they are “US persons” in the eyes of the taxman.
One example, Field said, was when people who, born of one American parent and a foreign parent, are considered US citizens. They may have never travelled to the US, learned English or obtained a passport, but they are subject to reporting and tax laws in the US.
Another common case involves people who have a green card, but have been away from the US for so long that they can no longer use it to enter the country. But if they did not file forms to formally declare their expatriation with the US Internal Revenue Service, they may still be liable for taxes and reporting requirements.
“This could apply to people living in Hong Kong or Taiwan who took a green card decades ago, out of fear because of possible political instability in the region, who never set foot in the US, who now could owe taxes or penalties for failure to file or for taxes owed,” Field said. “For immigration purposes, it’s dead. But for tax purposes, it may be very much alive, depending on the circumstances.
Timothy Burns, Field’s colleague at Withers, said: “We see people who are enraged when they come to us and they say, ‘I never knew any of this, and you’re telling me that I’m either poor or I’m a criminal. I either have to willfully ignore what you are telling me, making me a criminal, or I have to give my life savings to the IRS and I’ve never been to America.’
“That’s why we are seeing a lot of people give up US status.”
There are an estimated 60,000 US citizens living in Hong Kong, according to the US State Department. There are also many Hong Kong residents who hold a US green card, or permanent residency status, though the department could not provide a specific number.
In addition to paying local taxes, these citizens and residents must regularly declare their earnings to the Internal Revenue Service, the tax enforcement arm of the US Treasury Department. The US is one of the few countries that taxes its citizens and permanent residents living abroad, and those who made more than US$91,400 in annual income are also subject to US taxes.
US taxpayers must also disclose the combined value of their personal overseas bank accounts if they exceed US$10,000 at any time in a given year. Last month, US President Barack Obama signed legislation that forces foreign financial institutions, trusts and corporations to hand over information about their US clients.
The new law imposes additional reporting requirements for people with foreign assets. Taxpayers must now report foreign assets cumulatively valued at more than US$50,000, including accounts in a non-US bank, non-US investments, and passive foreign investment companies. Failure to report could result in fines of US$10,000 or more, on top of the previous fines and penalties.
Because of the Byzantine rules, “many people think in good faith that they are in compliance with the American rules, when they in fact are not”, Field said. “As a tax lawyer, I know a bit better; but it cost me a lot – three years of law school and 30 years of practice in the field – for me to understand these issues.”
And for some, the cost of compliance is no longer worth the benefits.
“Now that I’m spending more time overseas, I definitely feel like people with green cards don’t enjoy the upside, but get all the downside,” said one Hong Kong-born, US green card holder. Educated in the US, she received an Ivy League education and has worked for prominent international firms in America and abroad. She has had a green card for most of her life, but has been weighing whether to give up her US status.
The reasons, she said, ranged from the practical to the personal. “The universal taxation. That is actually a major disincentive. On the personal level, my family is in Hong Kong and they’ve decided not to retire in the States,” she said.
Last month’s new tax rules were “definitely something that’s on my mind”, she said. “It creates the appearance that the paperwork and the hassle are going to be even more of a pain in the future.
“Most people I know living in Hong Kong with US green cards, they all give it to accountants to do it. I know some friends who make special annual trips to the US just to talk to their US accountant. It is crazy.
“A lot of people in the ’80s got citizenship because they were afraid of the handover. They didn’t know what awaited them in Hong Kong. But the handover has already taken place, and China is becoming more developed and stronger. And Hong Kong is so international and it’s politically and economically stable. You could argue that some of us are more marketable in the labour market here than we are in the US,” she said. “I actually have relatives who have moved back to Hong Kong.
“And frankly, there are people in Hong Kong with multiple citizenships … you can argue that some countries also offer the same political clout that the US offers to its nationals overseas. The relative value of the US passport has diminished.”
Update: Related article in N.Y. Times. (Hat tip to Alex Lau).